“Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.” Matthew 6:9-13 KJV.
This, the Lord’s Prayer, acts as a curse to any who defy God and work to do harm against his people, for it envisages the destruction of evil and the deliverance of those who choose to follow Christ. It calls upon the highest magick of all, the will of God, in order to bring about a day where evil will be vanquished and those who hunger after truth and justice will be satisfied.
Clearly, it shows that temptation is a weakness for those who call upon God, for it is the weakness of temptation that those who have rejected God have given themselves over to, and exists as the source of their evil and their willingness to partake in it. Therefore, it contemplates that by succumbing to temptation God’s people make themselves vulnerable, whereas rising above that temptation makes them strong.
God’s people are being tested now and must learn to abandon that which is of this earth to attain the highest spiritual strength possible. God’s kingdom here on earth has little room for those who would succumb and resign themselves to a life that is fulfilled by evil works.
Daily bread represents a continuing connection with God the almighty and the right and ability to call upon him for help and guidance in a world that is teeming with evil. Those still connected to the Holy Spirit can get their daily bread, and it will help them in their fight against those who seek man’s downfall. Obviously, the call for God’s kingdom on earth means that this connection and those who have it will be fulfilled in their duty to do what is right and to share in the wealth of the spirit, to help others tap into this connection and satiate their hunger for truth and justice as well.
As this connectivity spreads, the strength of God’s people will increase to a critical mass, whereby evil’s back is against the wall. Those who are attempting to starve others of their daily bread, will have to either choose to willingly partake of God’s word and welcome the Holy Spirit or choose to perish and reap what they have sown.
One difference between a Luciferian and a Christian is that the Luciferian would seek to force you to rebuke this daily bread, starving you of it, as they secretly and knowingly kill you, while Christians offer to teach and help sustain others on this bread, as they openly profess their wish that everybody get to enjoy eternal life. One is the way of lies, secrets, and death, while the other is the way of truth, transparency, and life. In my view, the latter way is superior and consists of the highest form of magick..
Copyright 2014 by Baby Victor Productions.
If attacks on free speech and internet communications are part of globalist plans for full spectrum dominance of the world population, and represent a specific attack on the informational field of those that they seek to dominate, then part of the funding for government shilling, trolling, and propaganda must partially come from the black budgets of the agencies and institutions that are involved with this tanking of the public discourse for sixth column purposes.
That means perhaps the best way to fight this is for citizens to call their congressmen and congresswomen and ask for them to start a congressional investigation into these matters, and most definitely audit the budgets of these agencies, looking specifically for the funding trail. There should also be an investigation into the international source of some of this funding as well, because much of the money is being sent offshore and later introduced via offshore sources to deliberately obfuscate the paper trail and hide those at the top who are funding the madness, which any person can realistically view by merely clicking through to virtually any online medium today.
The objective is to gain complete control of one of the most powerful mediums known to man, so that it can be manipulated with gatekeepers, marketing experts, and propaganda departments in much the same way that television, radio, magazines, and billboards were controlled in the post World War II era. This is dangerous in the sense that it would allow for another long epoch of mind control and public manipulation in order to keep citizens in check under a global government, stagnating thought and preventing the natural evolution of man’s destiny, in favor of a destiny chosen by those who are seeking to control the discourse, which despite claims made by hypocrites, and given their penchant for political violence and mass mind manipulation, anyone can tell is not in humanity’s best interest.
Copyright 2014 by Baby Victor Productions.
Joint Force 2020 is the blueprint for further converting the U.S. military completely into the New World Order’s globalist enforcer and a step to developing a single military police force to respond to any local or regional problem that may challenge the supremacy of this international world government that they are in the process of building.
American conflicts since Vietnam have all been geared toward completing this objective, and in fact, much of what was done there, and has been done since, with respect to the U.S. military, was designed to push the American military further along a trajectory that those who have subverted the U.S. government view as inevitable. It can also be seen as a perfecting of tactics and strategies that will be deployed by the international order to attack any individual or group that challenges the global order that is being built.
The attack on “conspiracy theorists” in the social media is merely a part of the full spectrum dominance that is to be deployed to further the aims of the globalists, and exists as an example of how they wage war against individuals who are challenging the rising international structure of world government.
Furthermore, the handing over of the internet to the international community is par for the course in terms of furthering these objectives, and it is very much a part of the same agenda that is pushing Joint Force 2020. It represents the move towards handing the informational portion of their war fighting efforts (which really includes the serious curtailment of the free speech rights of individuals) over to the internationalists for two purposes; (1) it is designed to help deflect blame and provide cover for the use of U.S. cyber-warriors and U.S. intelligence agencies against civilians who are exercising their First Amendment rights in America; and (2) it is a preparation toward handing those very agencies and institutions over to the internationalists and putting them under the authority of international command.
The writing is on the wall, which is very much why there is a race to try to destroy those elements in the United States which are speaking out against these disturbing trends, while simultaneously running false flags in an attempt to get Americans to agree to disarmament. Obviously, the citizens that exist in the nation which the internationalists used as their den, hollowing out its traditions, institutions, media, and treasury to further these aims represents the greatest threat to the New World Order, which is why we are under such heavy attack, covertly, overtly, propagandistically, economically, and legalistically.
The sooner that those coming under attack realize what it is that is happening, the better off they are going to come out in the long run, in terms of protecting that which is important, which is the conservation of the values and rights which most directly threaten those who would turn the U.S. military into a tool to be used and absorbed of by international order in order to push worldwide totalitarianism, i.e. the New World Order.
Copyright 2014 by Baby Victor Productions.
People know that they are in deep trouble if an organization or government puts a fatwa on them for what they have written.
The case of the Satanic Verses is. . .complex, although the threat against Rushdie was mindlessly simple. I was on assignment in the Iranian Holy city of Qom during the height of the controversy, and I asked the leaders of several of the religious schools there what they would do if they suddenly encountered Rushdie. Would they actually murder him? “Of course,” the head of one of the schools told me. “It would be my duty.”
Is the recent debacle in the state of New Hampshire over the book “Nineteen Minutes” the latest in a series of events that have been ginned up to tie the conservative movement to terrorist groups, by getting people in the alternative media to drum up support for a cause, coax people to take sides, knowing ahead of time what sides people are likely to take, and then later move in with the main stream media after some event or revelation takes place that allows them to compare those who are outraged by the fact that they are foisting questionable and low quality literary material onto our school children as the American Taliban?
If you are unfamiliar with the story, you can read about it here:
It seems that much is being done lately to psychologically tie the American conservative movement to radical jihadists. Cementing that emotional connection in the minds of the majority is very important to the people who have breached the social contract with the American people and who would like to start imprisoning Americans under the National Defense Authorization Act. Therefore, I think that this possibility may be worth mentioning.
I am suggesting that in the midst of the latest controversy centering about a book that was assigned to 9th graders, the arrest of a father who challenged this during a local school board meeting, and all the hype that is being generated because of this, this event might be used as another way to paint conservative groups and patriots as domestic terrorists, by having paid agents issue threats, engage in violent acts, and generally create an environment where, once again, they paint the political right as dangerous and threatening. This time the goal might be to classify those on the right as book burners and fanatics who threaten other people for what they write, while stating that these people are acting like the Taliban.
This would be done in order to actually clamp down on the speech and rights of conservative groups, after creating a fake controversy that may have been generated to clamp down on their rights in a way that is precisely what they are accusing the targets of such an action of doing. Flipping the script and accusing the opposition of engaging in the very behavior that is targeting them seems to be the modus operandi of the globalists and the left in the Western world.
I hope you’re not a sucker for propaganda. I hope if someone did put the equivalent to a Jihad on an author for what they wrote, it would concern you if it were paid agent making the threats and carrying out the violence, and that you are not the type of person who will not complain simply because the real perpetrators share your ideology and it can be spun to attack your enemies. I hope that you care about the truth and can see through all of the lying propaganda, even if it features such big name actors as Jeff Daniels.
Interestingly enough, I am pretty sure that the questions asked above, and many people’s feelings about such issues, could be why they might be able to use this school assignment and the failure to notify parents of the book’s racy content as a way of stirring up emotions in a particular demographic. Most people out here are getting sick of the lying propaganda, and that is exactly what the book which was assigned to these school children happens to be, only it is directed towards children.
However, what I am proposing is that they may be using this event to stir up those emotions, so that they can activate more of their assets to do or say something that will allow them to propagandize against the people who are sick of living in propaganda La La Land, in such a way as to fit with all of the earlier propaganda efforts that they have spent billions upon, including the movie “The Newsroom,” starring Jeff Daniels. What we are witnessing is the type of demonization that used to be reserved for foreign enemies, now being directed against citizens of this nation.
Furthermore, it should be noted that such groups who would do such things have long been interested in demonizing the homeschooling demographic as part of their war against large segments of the American population.
“[In 2004], the Muskegon Chronicle reported on a Department of Homeland Security sponsored terrorism drill involving the Muskegon Area Intermediate School District and the Muskegon County Emergency Services. A mock attack would occur on a public school bus. The simulated attack would come from a fictitious radical group called “Wackos Against Schools and Education” who believe everyone should be homeschooled.”
You should also be aware that this comes on the heals of the U.S. Supreme Court denying certiorari to hear a case involving a German family that had immigrated to the United States to seek asylum because the German government was coming down upon them for attempting to home school their children, and that the Obama Administration’s lawyers took a particular interest in fighting to deny this family the asylum that they were so desperately seeking, at least until the precedent could be set for later cases.
Clearly, the globalist agenda is to destroy the ability of families to home school their children, and the demonization of such groups would be a critical factor in adopting policies in the United States that more closely mirror those of Germany, where homeschooling has been illegal since Adolf Hitler outlawed it in 1938.
Any form of totalitarianism, including this global version that some people have been trying to move the world towards, is highly dependent upon indoctrination of the younger generations. Therefore, I remain skeptical of events that seem to could be used to further such a demonization agenda, especially when it occurs on the heals of the Cliven Bundy incident out in Nevada, where the Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, has taken the occasion to start throwing around the domestic terrorist label.
Of course, why not kill two birds with one stone, and deliberately use the Streisand effect to push some of that same kind of propaganda that has made people so receptive and vulnerable to such manipulation, while getting people interested in the piece of garbage that is at the center of this controversy in the process?
The Streisand effect is the phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet.
Either I have become too cynical because of everything that I have witnessed playing out in my lifetime, or the master manipulators pulling the media’s strings actually do think of everything. Hopefully, we will figure out which it is, and people will not get played, once again, in the process.
Copyright 2014 by Baby Victor Productions.
Much hubbub was made recently concerning Republican politicians and commentators and the support that they offered Cliven Bundy during his stand against armed Bureau of Land Management agents last month. This came after Adam Nagourney of the New York Times produced quotes that made it possible to depict Cliven Bundy as a racist and smear anyone associated with the state’s right movement concerning massive property holdings of the federal government in western states, or any freedom loving conservative for that matter, as a racist sympathizer or fool.
Once again the left is exposing their massive hypocrisy. Lest we forget about the Democratic Party’s close ties, support, and use of Reverend Jim Jones’ followers back in the 1970s. This was much more than prominent politicians getting caught up in the fray of a fight that exemplified and focused the feelings that the American people had been developing regarding the government that was being created, which seems to value collectivism over individuality. This association is at the heart of the Democratic Party and those who associated with this man and supported him are now prominent members of the political establishment in Washington D.C., including Dianne Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi.
Jim Jones was central to Bay Area politics prior to convincing over a thousand of his followers to move to Guyana and try to work out the bugs in the mind control programming so necessary for the leftist political machinery that such Marxists have been working hard to build in the United States, since the early 20th century. It wasn’t until this experiment in communitarian living and collectivism, which no doubt, the Democrats have tried to incorporate into their party brand, went awry, resulting in the murder of nearly a thousand men, women, and children, including a congressman who was investigating this Democrat Party operative, that Democrats distanced themselves and worked to erase history, so that people could forget about their associations with this evil man who was the embodiment of everything that the left now represents.
The quoted text that follows underneath this paragraph represents is an excellent expose on the link between the Democrats and the Jim Jones cult. I find it interesting that this Jonesque psychology has been scaled up and has been very much centered about the unknown political figure and cult leader who they ran for president in 2008, named Barack Obama, who has been busy destroying the United States since his victory in the Presidential race in that year, in many cases using some of the same cult tactics to get the job done. Hopefully, this scaled up version of Jonestown will not end with the kind of scaled-up disaster that one might expect. However, at the moment, things aren’t looking so good, as this administration is doing everything that it can to bring the unwilling into the fold and get them blood-cemented to the crimes of treason that have been carried out under Obama. Perhaps the only thing saving this nation from that scaled-up catastrophe is the fact that such a large percentage of the population is not complicit in the collectivism and evil that they offer. Only time will tell.
Here is an excerpt from the piece authored by Dr. Melvin Johnson entitled, “The Jonestown Guyana Tragedy No One Wants to Talk About.”
Of particular interest to politicians was the Temple’s ability to produce 2,000 people for work or attendance in San Francisco with only six hours’ notice.”
Rev. Jones’ ability to mobilize so many people, so quickly… who were willing to do practically anything he instructed them to do for the Democratic Party was one of the most cost-effective political machinery strategies ever! Having started his California church in Ukiah, Rev. Jones expanded his influence throughout the state with churches in at least six other major cities including San Francisco, Los Angeles and Sacramento! His influence in the black community apparently raised the ire of many of the African American leaders including the Nation of Islam. However, this process is neither new nor unique. The marriage between the Democratic Party and the black church had become a well-recognized tradition, from the Northeast to the Deep South, with the western states being even more influenced! It has been obvious that the politicians had become more interested in the political benefits than the well-being of the church members.
Therefore, this provokes an interesting question: at what point did Pelosi, Feinstein and other Democratic Party stalwarts begin to reject Rev. Jim Jones’ ideology and his quest for power, or did they? None of the Democratic Party leadership appeared to care how Rev. Jones handled the members as long as he produced voters and campaign workers! To benefit them, Rev. Jones commanded The People’s Temple members to work tirelessly with robotic devotion. Corey Buscher, former press secretary to the late Mayor George Moscone stated that Rev. Jones “made his followers available to support progressive Democrat candidates.” He also recognized that Rev. Jones “offered thousands of ‘foot soldiers’ willing to walk precincts and get out the vote… an offer no politician in his right mind could refuse.” Another political power broker had stated that “If you were having a rally for a presidential candidate, you need to fill up the crowd, you could always get busloads from Jim Jones’ church.”
Copyright 2014 by Baby Victor Productions.